<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal or ethical? A question about copyright violation</title>
	<link>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/</link>
	<description>Yours might not be.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: markk</title>
		<link>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1528</link>
		<author>markk</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 14:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>Good point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1525</link>
		<author>Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyer</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>Actually a very simple issue.  It is all about ownership and not consumption. When you are downloading a book you are transferring ownership of said material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually a very simple issue.  It is all about ownership and not consumption. When you are downloading a book you are transferring ownership of said material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markk</title>
		<link>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1455</link>
		<author>markk</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>Dunno, molk. Try submitting it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunno, molk. Try submitting it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themolk</title>
		<link>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1454</link>
		<author>themolk</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>Where did my comment go? My defining commment that would have ceased this infernal navel gazing? SIGH... some people are obviously too busy with their "new look and feel"...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did my comment go? My defining commment that would have ceased this infernal navel gazing? SIGH&#8230; some people are obviously too busy with their &#8220;new look and feel&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markk</title>
		<link>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1448</link>
		<author>markk</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>Devastating, eh Mat? We shall see.

1. Authors do indeed receive compensation for having their books in libraries. But how much compensation? Under the "Public Lending Right" scheme, authors receive $1.40 for each copy of their books in a library. So if that book is then borrowed 50 times, that's only 3c per reader!

For more info on the PLR scheme go to http://www.dcita.gov.au/arts_culture/arts/lending_rights/public_lending_rights_guidelines_for_claimants

2. I think you'll find Borders would prefer customers to read only a few chapters over a cup of coffee, and then buy the book to take home.

I could also point out that most works uploaded to BitTorrent were purchased legally by the uploader.

Mat, consider yourself owned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Devastating, eh Mat? We shall see.</p>
<p>1. Authors do indeed receive compensation for having their books in libraries. But how much compensation? Under the &#8220;Public Lending Right&#8221; scheme, authors receive $1.40 for each copy of their books in a library. So if that book is then borrowed 50 times, that&#8217;s only 3c per reader!</p>
<p>For more info on the PLR scheme go to <a href="http://www.dcita.gov.au/arts_culture/arts/lending_rights/public_lending_rights_guidelines_for_claimants" rel="nofollow">http://www.dcita.gov.au/arts_culture/arts/lending_rights/public_lending_rights_guidelines_for_claimants</a></p>
<p>2. I think you&#8217;ll find Borders would prefer customers to read only a few chapters over a cup of coffee, and then buy the book to take home.</p>
<p>I could also point out that most works uploaded to BitTorrent were purchased legally by the uploader.</p>
<p>Mat, consider yourself owned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markk</title>
		<link>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1447</link>
		<author>markk</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 06:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>While copyright has its flaws, I'd rather have copyright than not have it, as it allows a huge amount of music, films and books to flourish that we wouldn't have otherwise.

Better what we have than China, where piracy rules and there is practically no local music industry. I read somewhere that only 12 CDs were commercially released by the Chinese music industry last year. 12! I don't know the figure for any western countries, but it would be in the thousands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While copyright has its flaws, I&#8217;d rather have copyright than not have it, as it allows a huge amount of music, films and books to flourish that we wouldn&#8217;t have otherwise.</p>
<p>Better what we have than China, where piracy rules and there is practically no local music industry. I read somewhere that only 12 CDs were commercially released by the Chinese music industry last year. 12! I don&#8217;t know the figure for any western countries, but it would be in the thousands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1442</link>
		<author>Mat</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>1. Erm... authors receive 

a) Royalties from sales to libraries

and

b) Royalties from all library borrowing.

2. What was that? Over a coffee? Reading a copy that Borders has already paid for? So

1) Author already receives royalties

2) Borders also receives indirect compensation through the coffees it would take to get through the book

So your point is false, because the first two examples can CLEARLY not be compared to your Bit Torrent efforts. 

There. I win. This comment has been so devastating that it's almost post worthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Erm&#8230; authors receive </p>
<p>a) Royalties from sales to libraries</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>b) Royalties from all library borrowing.</p>
<p>2. What was that? Over a coffee? Reading a copy that Borders has already paid for? So</p>
<p>1) Author already receives royalties</p>
<p>2) Borders also receives indirect compensation through the coffees it would take to get through the book</p>
<p>So your point is false, because the first two examples can CLEARLY not be compared to your Bit Torrent efforts. </p>
<p>There. I win. This comment has been so devastating that it&#8217;s almost post worthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irvine Mortgage</title>
		<link>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1438</link>
		<author>Irvine Mortgage</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>Copyrights are all a little finicky in my opinion. It's almost like hiding a scientific discovery...someone's going to find out about it. What these companies should really do is find a way to profit from copyright infringement...like the RIAA setting up it's own version of Napster with advertisements and everything. People are going to do it and you're not going to stop them, might as well jump on the wagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copyrights are all a little finicky in my opinion. It&#8217;s almost like hiding a scientific discovery&#8230;someone&#8217;s going to find out about it. What these companies should really do is find a way to profit from copyright infringement&#8230;like the RIAA setting up it&#8217;s own version of Napster with advertisements and everything. People are going to do it and you&#8217;re not going to stop them, might as well jump on the wagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markk</title>
		<link>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1436</link>
		<author>markk</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1436</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Pete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Pete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Aldin</title>
		<link>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1435</link>
		<author>Pete Aldin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://myopinionsareimportant.com/2007/07/24/legal-or-ethical-a-question-about-copyright-violation/#comment-1435</guid>
		<description>I like the irony of the three ways of getting through the material. Good point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the irony of the three ways of getting through the material. Good point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
